Media Gaslighting, Early July 2020 Edition

-- President Trump visited Mount Rushmore for a speech; the media called Mount Rushmore a monument to white supremacy that honors two men who owned slaves, and say it was built on land stolen from Native Americans. You may be surprised to learn that this is not how the monument was described when it was visited by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders. Nothing about either Mount Rushmore or what we know about Mount Rushmore has changed in the past twelve years. So what has?

-- The president's speech was uplifting and unifying, and warned against the current trend of cancel culture and the push to destroy monuments. The media, perhaps listening to the wrong speech, described Trump's words as "dark" and "divisive," and pretended that cancel culture and the tearing down of monuments were figments of the president's orange imagination. Tammy Duckworth claimed, without any supporting evidence, that the president was defending "traitors" and "Confederates." I wish there were a follow-up question so we could find out, with the terms "traitors" and "Confederates," Duckworth was referring to Ella Fitzgerald, Martin Luther King, Harriet Tubman, Louis Armstrong, Muhammad Ali, or the Tuskegee airmen, whom the president had praised.

-- While discussing COVID-19 policy with respect to the upcoming new school year, Kayleigh McEnany said the following: "The president has said unmistakably that he wants schools to open. And I was just in the Oval talking to him about that. And when he says open, he means open and full, kids being able to attend each and every day at their school. The science should not stand in the way of this. And as Dr. Scott Atlas said, I thought this was a good quote. Of course, we can do it. Everyone else in the Western world, our peer nations are doing it. We are the outlier here. The science is very clear on this, that for instance, you look at the JAMA Pediatric study of 46 pediatric hospitals in North America that said the risk of critical illness from COVID is far less for children than that of seasonal flu. The science is on our side here, and we encourage for localities and states to just simply follow the science, open our schools. It’s very damaging to our children. There’s a lack of reporting of abuse, there’s mental depressions that are not addressed, suicidal ideations that are not addressed when students are not in school. Our schools are extremely important. They’re essential and they must reopen. Yes."

Several media outlets then proceeded to quote McEnany, but carefully snipped her words exactly at the words, "the science should not stand in the way of this." Just a few sentences later, of course, McEnany's context is clear -- that the science will not stand in the way of the administration's directives because the science does not contradict the directives. Science is on their side, McEnany said, but, rather than merely question that statement, which would have been in bounds, the media actually made believe that she was implying that the administration was acting in spite of science, which is an absurd and unfair allegation for the media to make, but also the type of attack that has become all too common.

-- The president was also recently asked about the incidences of African-Americans dying while in police custody, and responded by pointing out, accurately, that more Caucasians die in police custody. Media outlets rushed to "correct" his comment by stating that African-Americans die at a greater proportion than their percentage of the population would suggest, implying systemic racism as responsible for the disparity -- but virtually none of them mentioned proportionality to the rates of violent crimes committed, which account for the difference in outcome.

Here's the thing, Fourth Estate: if you are as tired as I am of hearing the phrase, "fake news," then perhaps one antidote would be to stop peddling it as often as you do.